NAR Dipping Into The Mortgage Pool?

Realtors Federal Credit Union

Jay Thompson wrote about the NAR’s foray into the world of controlled finances over a year ago…Eric Stegemann brought the topic up while at RE BarCamp-Phoenix, indicating it was his understanding that after a few delays, its a go. Fascinating implications.

The largest trade organization in the United States, with all its lobbyist power, is for all practical purposes a lender.  Yes, yes, NAR and the Realtors (INSERT COPYRIGHT SYMBOL HERE) Federal Credit Union (RFCU) are separate and apart in all the right places but I love the messaging coming off the article on realtor.org:

Because operations will be on the Internet, REALTORS® FCU will be sensitive to the work habits and lifestyles of REALTORS®, most of whom are independent contractors who are compensated by commissions.”

All REALTORS® and their families are eligible to become REALTORS® FCU  members. REALTORS® employees and staff, including NAR, state and local boards and associations, and NAR’s institutes, societies and councils are also eligible. REALTOR® clients and customers, such and home buyers and home sellers, are not eligible.

Whats clear:

A year ago, pre-credit crisis, this was a borderline *yawn*, today its stands to be a pretty big deal.  Access to a credit union is a real benefit, yielding –>credit<– to its members using  their own underwriting guidelines, separate and apart from Big Bank or gov’t regulated programs.

Mortgages for those of self-employed and commission based income ilk don’t (really) exist in the mainstream anymore.  My opinion, which isn’t usually positive when it comes to NAR’s moves is just that, positive.  RFCU stands to provide real benefits to the member contingency, substantiating the dues to be a Realtor (INSERT COPYRIGHT SYMBOL HERE).

Whats speculation:

Right now, clients and consumers are not eligible as the RFCU is careful to not trip the line hypocritic with their hard stance against banks getting into the real estate sales industry.  But I can only wonder how ‘Americas Largest Trade Orgaization’ might choose to flex their lobbyist muscles in the future? NAR can actually compete with Big Bank lobbyists on Capitol Hill.

If the banks won’t lend in a common sensical fashion (a common theory), then consumers can’t buy…if consumers cant buy, then Realtors can’t pay NARs dues…NAR loses income and voices…

Does this ‘force’ NAR’s hands to get in the mortgage game?  The argument is compelling and someone needs to check the Big Banks actions.  The irony of NAR, recently accused of anti-competitive practices by the Dept of Justice, chipping away at The Banks increasing monopolistic nature would be great theater.

Do they push to allow clients access to RFCU mortgages?  Now that’s a neatly marketable reason of solid tangible value to use a Realtor (INSERT COPYRIGHT SYMBOL HERE).

(I know health benefits are important too…thats another subject for another day…)

  • you can say that National Association of Realtors are dipping a little bit in martgage pool but i don't think that a marriage have made between these in heaven.
  • Kenneth G. Smith II
    If someone can pay rent, that rent can be considered part of a mortgage payment. The government is providing $8,000 for first time buyers, so why can’t the government pay part of the payment and have the borrower repay the government in the future?? Here is an example of how it could work.

    • Mr. and Mrs. ZZZZZ have a mortgage payment of $1,170 ($200,000 loan with 30 year payout at 5.75% interest).
    • The ZZZZ’s lose their job and can only pay $470, so the government pays the difference of $700
    • So the ZZZZ’s remain homeowners and work through their problem. It takes the ZZZZ’s 10 months to get back on their feet, the government paid out $7,000 and now the ZZZZ’s owe the government.
    • But the government says okay, you can start paying us back in seven years and the payment will be over 10 years at an interest rate of 3%.

    What the government has done is to provide assistance to the property owner (just like the bailout plans for the Financial Industry and Automotive Industry) and requires them to pay back the obligation starting in seven years. This is not a freebie, but short term assistance. Franklin Roosevelt called it Lend Lease.


    This program is not perfect, but it can assist a lot of people who want to own homes. Most importantly, it is channeled directly to the property owner, not a large corporation that has other motives besides keeping the property owner solvent.
    A significant benefit of this program is that payments to financial institutions will resume and cash flow will get back to normal levels, thus credit availability should improve.

    There needs to be conditions such as confirming gross income via income tax statements; confirming employment and confirming current payroll. The only group of individuals who would be excluded are those who own more than one property (there should be no break to the investor who treated real estate as a business) and cases where mortgage fraud exists in the form of straw buyers and invalid sales (properties that sold more than three times within five years and the value change was greater than 150%).

    This total assistance would be capped at $50,000 and could run for 24 to 36 months
    In a given year up to $25,000 could be provided.
    The government would be releasing the funds over 12 months, thus the federal outlay would be limited.
    The total cost of $10 million loans receiving assistance would be $250 billion per year or $500 billion in total.
    This is much cheaper than the TARP bailout and part of this can be funded with the current $70 billion in TARP repayments.
    The greatest difficulty in implementing this program is processing and accounting. Loan Servicing companies would need to add staff (if one servicer can process 50 applications a week, 4,000 servicers would need to be hired, plus additional support staff) Wow, as many as 10,000 new jobs would be created. Add to this job creation the fact that several million homes do not go into foreclosure and more jobs are not lost due to desperate situations.

    Yes it is possible and yes it can work.

    The reason it can work is because real estate goes through cycles. If people are forced to sell at liquidation prices, everyone loses. Give property owners a chance to get back on their feet, get back to work and the whole economy starts to turn around.

    As stated earlier, this is not perfect and many will complain about the injustice. But think about the injustice of the corporate bailouts, the injustice that first time home buyers get a break, the injustice that shareholders come before the individuals who created value in the companies by buying products. One can go on and on, or we can try.

    We only fail if we do not try.
  • Tom
    I will hire you as an independent contractor to buy a home, then you can use the REALTOR FCU.
  • As an agent and member of NAR, I fully support having our own credit union as a vessel to get compettitive rates for any loan product - including home loans and auto notes. Despite respectable credit scores and passive income from military retirement, tightening of self-employed lending standards in the mortgage industry prevented the succesful accomplishemnt of some personal goals - at no fault of my own. A dog in this fight with an understanding of our industry would certainly get my business.
  • This could be a little dicey. Credit Unions want to get into the mortgage business in a big way too. This could be a marriage made in heaven.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Flag Posts
Mortgage 2.X

3 Questions to Ask Any Mortgage Professional

Digital Rolodex and Database Marketing

'Pointed' The Wrong Way

Fixed Fees for a Broken Business

How To Speculate on The Future of Mortgage Rates

Short Selling The Market

Pre-Payment Penalty Ponderings

Swindlers List

Mortgage Rate Pricing, The Disturbing Truth

Effect Of Transparency on The Mortgage and Real Estate Industries

Yield Spread Premiums. Definition, Disclosure and Depth

Yield Spread Premiums. Capital Hill Testimony

Crooked Mortgage Broker Tells All

Consumer Beware of Mortgage Salesmanship

The Traditional Real Estate Commission Model. A Critical Assessment

Critical Assessment of The Traditional Real Estate Commission Model II

Mortgage Pin Nears Housing Bubble

Its Not Just Sub-Prime...

The Need for Transparent Mortgage Rate Search

APR. The Annual Percentage Runaround

Traditional Real Estate Commission Structure, The $30,000,000,000 Problem.

Darwidgetry

How To Run A Mortgage Business Going Forward

The Ubiquitous, Perpetual Mortgage Solution Circle Jerk

How To Use The Proper Corporation To Minimize Your Tax Liability As a Real Estate Professional

Backslapping Mortgage Bailout, Fannie and Freddie Get a $200B Blank Check

The Economic Realities of Transparency for The Mortgage Brood

5 Tips For The Brave Soul Considering Real Estate Sales As a Career

What’s My Mortgage Rate And How Much Is It Going To Cost Me?

Risk Based Pricing. How Mortgage Rates are Determined

Risk Based Pricing. How Mortgage Rates are Determined- Property Type and Property Use

Risk Based Pricing How Mortgage Rates are Determined- Credit Scores and History

Risk Based Pricing How Mortgage Rates are Determined- Loan Amount and Loan to Value

Mortgage Industry Shock and Awe

Political Fear and Loathing on Wall Street

Pending Death and Future Living. Transparency, Technology, Social Media, Business Strategy, With Some Economics Sprinkled On Top

Contrived Attrition? Washingtons Play in The Fall and Rise of Wall Street

Survey Says...Realtors Suck!

Defining a Brand Through Business Strategyt

Drug Cartels, Cancerous Growth and The F*cked Mortgage Industry