<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Final Rule?  3 Years Late and Billions Later&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thexbroker.com/2008/07/15/the-final-rule-3-years-late-and-billions-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thexbroker.com/2008/07/15/the-final-rule-3-years-late-and-billions-later/</link>
	<description>Radical Transparency for The Real Estate and Mortgage Industrys</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: REALonomics</title>
		<link>http://thexbroker.com/2008/07/15/the-final-rule-3-years-late-and-billions-later/#comment-4122</link>
		<dc:creator>REALonomics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thexbroker.com/2008/07/15/the-final-rule-3-years-late-and-billions-later/#comment-4122</guid>
		<description>Did someone say "post mortem autopsies?"  Did someone say, "Let them spend 60 days cranking out logical, practical, enforceable policies coupled with easy to read documents?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What would the Fed be if that was the case?  Let&#39;s remind ourselves of two important realities. The task of every elected official is re-election or the perpetuation of self-exaltation.  Then, let&#39;s remind ourselves that nearly 90% of all bureaucrats and politicians have law degrees (you can deduce what you like from this).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, may I respectfully suggest we change this statement:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Let them spend 60 days cranking out logical, practical, enforceable policies coupled with easy to read documents. "&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To this statement:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Let them spend 6 months interfacing with consumers cranking out loan approvals and explaining in detail all of the fine print, disappearing ink and mumbo-jumbo contained in today&#39;s mortgage documents and then, finally, make them accountable for all actions."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice work Xman!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;REALonomics&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.REALonomics.net"&gt;www.REALonomics.net&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did someone say &#8220;post mortem autopsies?&#8221;  Did someone say, &#8220;Let them spend 60 days cranking out logical, practical, enforceable policies coupled with easy to read documents?&#8221;</p>
<p>What would the Fed be if that was the case?  Let&#39;s remind ourselves of two important realities. The task of every elected official is re-election or the perpetuation of self-exaltation.  Then, let&#39;s remind ourselves that nearly 90% of all bureaucrats and politicians have law degrees (you can deduce what you like from this).</p>
<p>Finally, may I respectfully suggest we change this statement:</p>
<p>&#8220;Let them spend 60 days cranking out logical, practical, enforceable policies coupled with easy to read documents. &#8220;</p>
<p>To this statement:</p>
<p>&#8220;Let them spend 6 months interfacing with consumers cranking out loan approvals and explaining in detail all of the fine print, disappearing ink and mumbo-jumbo contained in today&#39;s mortgage documents and then, finally, make them accountable for all actions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nice work Xman!</p>
<p>REALonomics<br /><a href="http://www.REALonomics.net">http://www.REALonomics.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MataHariBoniJovi</title>
		<link>http://thexbroker.com/2008/07/15/the-final-rule-3-years-late-and-billions-later/#comment-4121</link>
		<dc:creator>MataHariBoniJovi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thexbroker.com/2008/07/15/the-final-rule-3-years-late-and-billions-later/#comment-4121</guid>
		<description>Very nice. Did you have a shot of that circle jerk for YouTube? Anyway, the only thing that I would like to expand on is the notion of Yield Spreads, how they are disclosed and what effect they have on a loan. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think charging YSP is fine when the client can&#39;t afford the cash requirement to close the loan, IE; has no money for closing costs. In these cases, I see no problem with charging a little more... but I think there is a disparity in the amount borrowed to the amount charged.   e.g.; I borrow $300,000 and you charge me 6%. I don&#39;t have money for closing costs (total of $3000, or 1% of the loan amount) and you are going to charge me 6.5%? A full half point for $3000??? Sounds a bit high to me. If it were just on the $3000, I am not offended, but on the WHOLE loan amount? So, to borrow $3000 I will pay about $1500 more per year for 30 Years??? Now, I am saying "WTF"? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is an area where consumers get "confused". Really, they are just uninformed and many don&#39;t/can&#39;t "get it". Therein lies the reason for HR3519&#39;s YSP removal idea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The idea is stupid because, as you say, "day late, dime short", so to speak. The banks have already made their beds and you can hardly get a conforming loan, these days, anyway. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is how it always is with the government. It&#39;s like there are whispers in the halls of congress by the lobbyists... shhhh... "just let us make some money, we&#39;ll police ourselves, we promise...  Listen, John, Barack, I will take care of you on this, I promise.. Next campaign, we&#39;ll donate heavy behind you...   what do you care, anyway? It&#39;s someone else&#39;s money. All you need to do is LOOK LIKE you&#39;re doing something about it, you know that is how people vote. Just tell them what they WANT to hear. So, just turn the other way for at least a year and we&#39;ll bail you out of this, don&#39;t worry."  Then, you guys can go into your committee rooms and argue, trying to make the other side look like THEY are the problem. Don&#39;t you feel better now, Mr/Ms congressman? Nice puppy... (pat pat pat)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and people wonder why things don&#39;t get done in washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice. Did you have a shot of that circle jerk for YouTube? Anyway, the only thing that I would like to expand on is the notion of Yield Spreads, how they are disclosed and what effect they have on a loan. </p>
<p>I think charging YSP is fine when the client can&#39;t afford the cash requirement to close the loan, IE; has no money for closing costs. In these cases, I see no problem with charging a little more&#8230; but I think there is a disparity in the amount borrowed to the amount charged.   e.g.; I borrow $300,000 and you charge me 6%. I don&#39;t have money for closing costs (total of $3000, or 1% of the loan amount) and you are going to charge me 6.5%? A full half point for $3000??? Sounds a bit high to me. If it were just on the $3000, I am not offended, but on the WHOLE loan amount? So, to borrow $3000 I will pay about $1500 more per year for 30 Years??? Now, I am saying &#8220;WTF&#8221;? </p>
<p>This is an area where consumers get &#8220;confused&#8221;. Really, they are just uninformed and many don&#39;t/can&#39;t &#8220;get it&#8221;. Therein lies the reason for HR3519&#39;s YSP removal idea.</p>
<p>The idea is stupid because, as you say, &#8220;day late, dime short&#8221;, so to speak. The banks have already made their beds and you can hardly get a conforming loan, these days, anyway. </p>
<p>That is how it always is with the government. It&#39;s like there are whispers in the halls of congress by the lobbyists&#8230; shhhh&#8230; &#8220;just let us make some money, we&#39;ll police ourselves, we promise&#8230;  Listen, John, Barack, I will take care of you on this, I promise.. Next campaign, we&#39;ll donate heavy behind you&#8230;   what do you care, anyway? It&#39;s someone else&#39;s money. All you need to do is LOOK LIKE you&#39;re doing something about it, you know that is how people vote. Just tell them what they WANT to hear. So, just turn the other way for at least a year and we&#39;ll bail you out of this, don&#39;t worry.&#8221;  Then, you guys can go into your committee rooms and argue, trying to make the other side look like THEY are the problem. Don&#39;t you feel better now, Mr/Ms congressman? Nice puppy&#8230; (pat pat pat)</p>
<p>and people wonder why things don&#39;t get done in washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooks Hadlin</title>
		<link>http://thexbroker.com/2008/07/15/the-final-rule-3-years-late-and-billions-later/#comment-4120</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooks Hadlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thexbroker.com/2008/07/15/the-final-rule-3-years-late-and-billions-later/#comment-4120</guid>
		<description>Another much-needed dose of reality from The XBroker.  If I&#39;d ready this anywhere else, I probably wouldn&#39;t believe it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pass the KY.  Did you get the flavored kind this time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another much-needed dose of reality from The XBroker.  If I&#39;d ready this anywhere else, I probably wouldn&#39;t believe it.  </p>
<p>Pass the KY.  Did you get the flavored kind this time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
